Solution 1 This week you are continuing to apply the coding skills …
This week you are continuing to apply the coding skills you have learned to services and procedures performed on the Urinary, Male and Female Reproductive systems and Maternity and Delivery. As you work on assigning codes for services performed on the Urinary system, reflect on the purpose and meaning of the guidelines found throughout this subsection.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Solution 1 This week you are continuing to apply the coding skills … completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
2. Initial Post: Create a new thread and answer all three parts of the initial prompt below
- Explain one (1) thing you learned from the coding guidelines for Renal Transplantation services preceding the codes (50300-50380) in the Urinary System subsection of the CPT manual.
- In your own words, summarize what you think that coding guideline (from question 1) is instructing the coder to do when assigning codes for those types of services.
- Describe how you will apply that coding guideline (from question 1) when assigning codes for those types of services.
References for coding skill
1. O’Malley KJ, Cook KF, Price MD, et al. Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1620–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Roos LL Jr, Nicol JP, Cageorge SM. Using administrative data for longitudinal research: comparisons with primary data collection. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:41–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Roos LL, Gupta S, Soodeen RA, et al. Data quality in an information-rich environment: Canada as an example. Can J Aging . 2005;24(Suppl 1):153–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Burns EM, Rigby E, Mamidanna R, et al. Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012;34:138–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Gologorsky Y, Knightly JJ, Lu Y, et al. Improving discharge data fidelity for use in large administrative databases. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36:E2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA. Validity of information on comorbidity derived from ICD-9-CCM administrative data. Med Care. 2002;40:675–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA. Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification administrative data. Med Care. 2004;42:801–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. CIHI data quality study of Ontario emergency department visits for fiscal year 2004-2005 – executive summary. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2008. [Google Scholar]
9. Martin BJ, Chen G, Graham M, et al. Coding of obesity in administrative hospital discharge abstract data: accuracy and impact for future research studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. CIHI data quality study of the 2009-2010 Discharge Abstract Database. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2012:115. [Google Scholar]
11. Bramley M, Reid B. Evaluation standards for clinical coder training. HIM J. 2007;36:20–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Hennessy DA, Quan H, Faris PD, et al. Do coder characteristics influence validity of ICD-10 hospital discharge data? BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Santos S, Murphy G, Baxter K, et al. Organisational factors affecting the quality of hospital clinical coding. HIM J. 2008;37:25–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Walker RL, Hennessy DA, Johansen H, et al. Implementation of ICD-10 in Canada: How has it impacted coded hospital discharge data? BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:149. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Callen J, Hines N, Rust J, et al. Is coding in theatres a viable option? A review of current theatre coding process at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. ACORN J. 1998;11:34–8. [Google Scholar]
16. Lorenzoni L, Da Cas R, Aparo UL. The quality of abstracting medical information from the medical record: the impact of training programmes. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11:209–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Lorenzoni L, Da Cas R, Aparo UL. Continuous training as a key to increase the accuracy of administrative data. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000;6:371–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. McKenzie K, Walker S. The Australian coder workforce 2002: a report of the National Clinical Coder Survey. Sydney (AU): University of Sydney; 2003. [Google Scholar]
19. Goodman LA. Snowball sampling. Ann Math Stat. 1961;32:148–70. [Google Scholar]
20. Heckathorn DD. Snowball versus respondent-driven sampling. Sociol Methodol. 2011;41:355–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Accredited HIM schools. London (ON): Canadian Health Information Management Association; 2017. [accessed 2017 May 29]. Available https://www.echima.ca/cchim/him-program.
22. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. [Google Scholar]
23. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Colorafi KJ, Evans B. Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD. 2016;9:16–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Canadian coding standards for version 2015 ICD-10-CA and CCI. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2015. [Google Scholar]
26. Canadian coding standards for version 2009 ICD-10-CA and CCI. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2009. [Google Scholar]
27. Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, George GS, et al. The essential SOAP note in an EHR age. Nurse Pract. 2016;41:29–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Lenert LA, Sakaguchi FH, Weir CR. Rethinking the discharge summary: a focus on handoff communication. Acad Med. 2014;89:393–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Mamykina L, Vawdrey DK, Stetson PD, et al. Clinical documentation: composition or synthesis? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:1025–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med. 1968;278:593–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Russo R. Documentation and data improvement fundamentals. In: Proceedings from the 2004 IFHRO Congress & AHIMA Convention; 2004 Oct.; Washington. Chicago: American Health Information Management Association; 2004. [accessed 2016 June 23]. Available http://bok.ahima.org/doc?oid=60174#.WVPNamdX7IU.
32. Surjan G. Questions on validity of International Classification of Diseases-coded diagnoses. Int J Med Inform. 1999;54:77–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Maximize your academic success with just one click! Discover the secret to exceptional grades and elevate your performance to unparalleled heights. Click now to access the ultimate solution to this Question
Explanation & AnswerOur website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.