Solution: Evaluate the degree and quality of care established within 18th Century U.S. hospitals, as compared to the level of care seen in today’s hospitals.

Evaluate the degree and quality of care established within 18th Century U.S. hospitals, as compared to the level of care seen in today’s hospitals.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Solution: Evaluate the degree and quality of care established within 18th Century U.S. hospitals, as compared to the level of care seen in today’s hospitals. completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

What are the basic steps in the development of U.S. health law, leading up to the present, to you or an employer’s need for health insurance coverage in light of the provisions that the Affordable Health Care Act sets forth.
Rationalize the fundamental way in which these laws play a pivotal part in understanding the roles that today’s health care administrators play.
Analyze the transition of health care from the 18th Century leading up to the 21st Century.
Evaluate the degree and quality of care established within 18th Century U.S. hospitals, as compared to the level of care seen in today’s hospitals.
Examine the primary roles of progressive health care law in shaping the current modern environments.



Colton D. Quality improvement in health care. Conceptual and historical foundations. Eval Health Prof. 2000;23:7–42. doi: 10.1177/01632780022034462. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Donabedian A. The evaluation of medical care programs. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1968;44:117–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Williamson JW. Evaluating quality of patient care. A strategy relating outcome and process assessment. JAMA. 1971;218:564–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1971.03190170042009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Brook RH, Appel FA. Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review. N Engl J Med. 1973;288:1323–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197306212882504. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Brook RH, Stevenson RL., Jr Effectiveness of patient care in an emergency room. N Eng J Med. 1970;283:904–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197010222831705. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Brook RH. The end of the quality improvement movement: long live improving value. JAMA. 2010;304:1831–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1555. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. McIntyre D, Rogers L, Heier E. Overview, history, and objectives of performance measurement. Health Care Financ Rev. 2001;22:7–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Loeb JM. The current state of performance measurement in health careInt J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(Suppl 1):i5–9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, ed. Washington, DC: N.A. Press; 2001.

10. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, in Title 42. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Editor; 1965.

11. Luce JM, Bindman AB, Lee PR. A brief history of health care quality assessment and improvement in the United States. West J Med. 1994;160:263–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Bohmer RMJ. Designing care: aligning the nature and management of health care. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2009. [Google Scholar]

13. Chassin MR, Loeb JM. The ongoing quality improvement journey: next stop, high reliability. Health Aff. 2011;30:559–68. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0076. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Leavitt MO, S.o.H.a.H.S. Report to congress on the evaluation of the quality improvement organization (qio) program for medicare beneficiaries for fiscal year 2006. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2009.

15. The Joint Commission. The Joint Commission history. Available at: Accessed June ,1 2012.

16. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(Suppl):166–206. doi: 10.2307/3348969. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Auerbach A. Healthcare quality measurement in orthopaedic surgery: current state of the art. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2542–7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0840-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The Institute of Medicine Study Process. Available at: Accessed June 1; 2012.

19. AHRQ. Working for Quality. Available at : Accessed June 1; 2012.

20. Duke University Medical Center. What is quality improvement? Available at: Accessed April 5; 2012.

21. Steinwachs DM, Hughes RG. Health services research: scope and significance; 2008. [PubMed]

22. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. HCAHPS Fact Sheet (CAHPS Hospital Survey). Available at: Fact Sheet 2010.pdf. Accessed June 7; 2012.

23. Sennett C. An introduction to the National Committee for Quality Assurance. Pediatr Ann. 1998;27:210–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. • Fisher E, Goodman D, Skinner J, Bronner K. Health care spending, quality, and outcomes. More isn’t always better. Dartmouth Atlas Healthcare Reports; 2009. Topic brief that examines relationship between regional differences in spending and the quality of care. Identifies 3 underlying causes of regional variation: lack of accountability for overall quality and costs of care; inadequate information on risks and benefits of common treatments, and assumption that more medical care equal better medical care; a flawed payment system that rewards more care, regardless of value. Available at:

25. Berwick DM. A user’s manual for the IOM’s ‘quality chasm’ report. Health Aff. 2002;21:80–90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.80. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Gagel BJ. Health Care Quality Improvement Program: a new approach. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995;16:15–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. The department of veterans affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491–507. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Khuri SF. The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery. 2005;138:837–43. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.016. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Fink AS, Campbell DA, Jr, Mentzer RM, Jr, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg. 2002;236:344–53. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200209000-00011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC; 1999.

31. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. “Front Matter.” Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001

32. National Quality Forum (NQF). About NQF. Available at: Accessed June 7; 2012.

33. The National Quality Forum. National quality forum mission and vision. Available at: Accessed June 7; 2012.

34. Bratzler DW, Hunt DR. The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:322–30. doi: 10.1086/505220. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Rosenberger LH, Politano AD, Sawyer RG. The surgical care improvement project and prevention of postoperative infection, including surgical site infection. Surg Infect. 2011;12:163–8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2010.083. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. • No Authors Listed. Rule emphasizes quality and cost savings. Hosp Case Manag. 2011;19:148–9. Summary of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2012 final rule on the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS). Rule establishes that hospitals will receive a net 1 % increase in reimbursement, also proposes to add a measure of Medicare spending per beneficiary to the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting program and the Value Based Purchasing program in effort to reduce costs by rewarding efficient care rather than volume. Finally in an effort to reduce preventable healthcare associated infections HAIs, the rule introduces new quality measures to be implemented in 2014 and 2015

37. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Legislative Update. Available at: https:// Accessed June 7; 2012.

38. US Congress. H.R. 6331 (110th): Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008. Available at: Accessed June 7; 2012.

39. Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare Program; payment policies under the physician fee schedule, 5-year review of work relative value units, clinical laboratory fee schedule: signature on requisition, and other revisions to Part B for CY 2012, in Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 228, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2011. [PubMed]

40. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician quality reporting system. Available at: Accessed April; 2012.

41. Congress, US, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Washington DC; 2010.

42. Pearson SD, Bach PB. How medicare could use comparative effectiveness research in deciding on new coverage and reimbursement. Health Affairs. 2010; 29. [PubMed]

43. US Department of Health and Human Services. Medicaid Program; payment adjustment for provider-preventable conditions including health care-acquired conditions, CFMM Services; 2011. [PubMed]

44. US Department of Health and Human Services, Annual progress report to Congress: National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care, USDoHaH Services, Washington, DC; 2012.

45. Department of Health and Human Services and Centers of Medicare & Medicais Services.

46. Berenson RA, Paulus RA, Kalman NS. Medicare’s readmissions-reduction program–a positive alternative. N Eng J Med. 2012;366:1364–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1201268. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. Itani K, Webb ALB, Fink AS. Approaches to assessing surgical quality of care. Hosp Physician. 2008;44:29–37. [Google Scholar]

48. Cooperberg MR, Birkmeyer JD, Litwin MS. Defining high quality health care. Urol Oncol. 2009;27:411–6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.015. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:626–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.017. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

50. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Maximize your academic success with just one click! Discover the secret to exceptional grades and elevate your performance to unparalleled heights. Click now to access the ultimate solution to this Question

Explanation & Answer

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

Similar Posts