NR543 Usability Assessment Graded Assignment #3
Usability Assessment
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR543 Usability Assessment Graded Assignment #3 completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Graded Assignment #3
Guidelines & Grading Rubric
The purpose of this assignment is to
- recognize the role of usability considerations in the design, use, and acceptance of technology;
- identify features that impact usability; and
- weigh the advantages of different usability-assessment methods.
Due Date: Submit to the Dropbox basket by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.
Select a software application, preferably an information system that you currently use in your work setting, to assess usability. You may personally test the application or solicit the participation of another party. You have the option to do one of the following:
- Address a list of questions that you create or adopt from a source that you will identify.
- Ask another party, via guided discussion, to assess the usability of the specified function/information system.
- Observe a user completing the identified function, noting the length of time required for completion, any obstacles, and at the conclusion of the task, ask for an impression on usability/issues. An example of a usability tool is included as an Appendix in the Lowry et al. (2012) reference on customized templates.
If you do not currently have access to an automated system, then speak with your instructor to determine a mutually agreeable alternative.
Lowry, S. Z., Quinn, M. T., Ramaiah, M., Schumacher, R. M., Patterson, E. S., North, R., Zhang, J., Gibbons, M. C., & Abbott, P. (2012). Technical evaluation, testing and validation of the usability of electronic health records. Retrieved from http://www.nist.gov/healthcare/usability/upload/EUP_WERB_Version_2_23_12-Final-2.pdf
- Required texts may be used as additional references.
- All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition.
- The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should not be longer than 5 pages.
- Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.
- Grammar, spelling, punctuation, format of the text, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA.
- Minimum number of scholarly references is: three (3).
|
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Introduction |
20 |
17 |
Introduction presents the topic of usability assessment. |
|
Background on function/information system assessed |
22 |
17 |
Provides detailed information on the function/information system assessed for usability that includes its purpose and approximate length of time that the function/information system has been available in its present format and student familiarity with the application used. |
|
Method of assessment |
22 |
17 |
Assessment method used and problems, or potential problems, identified. |
|
Evidence-based recommendations |
21 |
17 |
Provides evidence-based recommendations to resolve each problem identified. |
|
Conclusion |
21 |
17 |
Concluding statements summarize insights gained during the assignment. |
|
APA format |
6 |
5 |
Text, title page, and reference page(s) are consistent with APA format. |
|
References and citations |
6 |
5 |
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. |
|
Mechanics of writing |
7 |
5 |
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. |
|
|
125 |
100 |
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
Usability Assessment Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance |
Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance |
|
Content Possible Points = 106 Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
20 Points |
18 Points |
16 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
|
Introduction presents the topic of usability assessment in nursing informatics and names the key sections of the paper. |
Introduction presents the topic of usability assessment in nursing informatics and names some key sections of the paper. |
Introduction does not present the topic of usability assessment in nursing informatics OR does not name the key sections of the paper. |
Introduction does not present the topic of usability assessment in nursing informatics AND does not name the key sections of the paper |
Introduction is not present. |
|
|
Background on function/information system assessed |
22 Points |
20 Points |
18 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
|
Provides a clear description on the function/information system assessed that includes its purpose, length of time in use in the setting, and user familiarity (regular user, occasional user, new user). |
Provides a description on the function/information system assessed that includes its purpose, length of time in use in the setting, and user familiarity (regular user, occasional user, new user). |
Provides very limited information on the function/information system assessed. |
Provides very little information on the function/information system assessed. |
Provides no information on the function/information system assessed. |
|
|
Method of assessment |
22 Points |
20 Points |
18 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
|
Provides information on method for usability assessment and problems, or potential problems identified. |
Provides information on method for usability assessment and its advantages. |
Provides limited information on assessment measures. |
Provides very limited information on assessment measures. |
Provides no information on assessment measures. |
|
|
Evidence-based recommendations |
21 Points |
19 Points |
17 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
|
Evidence-based recommendations to resolve each problem are presented and discussed in detail. |
Evidence-based recommendations to resolve each problem are presented but discussion is limited. |
Evidence-based recommendations to resolve each problem are presented but not discussed. |
Evidence-based recommendations to resolve each problem are not presented |
Evidence-based recommendations are not discussed. |
|
|
Conclusion |
21 Points |
19 Points |
17 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
|
Concluding statements clearly summarize insights gained during the assignment. |
Concluding statements include insights gained during the assignment. |
Concluding statements include a partial summary of the insights gained during the assignment. |
Concluding statements do not summarize insights gained during the assignment. |
Conclusion is not present. |
|
|
Content Subtotal |
|
|
_____of 106 Points |
||
|
Format Possible Points = 19 Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
APA format |
6 Points |
5 Points |
4 Points |
2 Points |
0 Points |
|
0–3 errors in use of APA format in title page, body of the paper, references, or appendix. |
4–6 errors in use of APA format in title page, body of the paper, references, or appendix. |
7–8 errors in use of APA format in title page, body of the paper, references, or appendix. |
9 errors in use of APA format in title page, body of the paper, references, or appendix. |
10 or more errors in use of APA format in title page, body of the paper, references, or appendix. |
|
|
References and citations |
6 Points |
5 Points |
4 Points |
2 Points |
0 Points |
|
At least 3 scholarly references are provided. Texts may be used as additional references.
AND Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. |
Only 2 scholarly references are provided. AND Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. |
Only 1 scholarly reference is provided.
AND There are errors in the citation of ideas and information from other sources. |
There are multiple errors in the citation of ideas and information from other sources. |
No scholarly references are provided.
|
|
|
Mechanics of writing |
7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points |
2 Points |
0 Points |
|
0–3 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and other aspects of formal academic writing. Paper meets page restrictions. |
4–6 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and other aspects of formal academic writing. Paper meets page restrictions. |
7–8 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and other aspects of formal academic writing. OR Paper does not meet page restrictions. |
9 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and other aspects of formal academic |
10 or more errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and other aspects of formal academic writing.
|
|
|
Format Subtotal |
|
_____of 19 Points |
|||
|
Total Points |
|
|
_____of 125 Points |
||
Explanation & Answer
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.